Sometimes it is worth to take a look at
I’ve a project where I need to check every day expired records in a table. That table has a lastUpdateDate column, I simply check if the time passed from last update is greater than a given amount and for each record I must create a message for the user that owns the record, the relation is one to one, one user for each record. Moreover I do not want the user to receive a message each day, but a message even 30 days if he do not update the record, so I need to check also if a message was generated for each expired record. A couple of month ago I create a query with this structure.
|
|
That query simply return each expired record from TableA only if there is not a message directed to the owner of the record in the last 30 days. The real query is more complex with some other conditions but the general scheme is this. Today I saw that the query returned a timeout in the last execution cycle.I ran the query and found with horror that the query needs 90 seconds to execute. This sounds very strange, because tableA had 5.000 record and message table around 12.000 the server is not under heavy load.
When I look at the execution plan I saw a strange merge join operation with an output of 13.000.000 rows, I had no time to investigate so I decided to try to change the structure of the query because I know that not exists correlated subquery is often not the best solution for performance. The new query has the following structure
|
|
I simply store in a temporary table all messages directed to all users in the last 30 days, then I use the NOT IN operator when I run the query the execution time is less than one second
Alk.